There are two areas to consider here:

  • Design of the part to minimise production costs
  • Design of the part to minimise tooling costs

The two can be connected and the decision over which route to follow will depend on the anticipated quantities required of the part.  For the purposes of this article we shall concentrate on production costs.

From a design perspective, injection moulding is a heat process and it takes time for parts to cool sufficiently to solidify before ejection from the mould.  Put simply, the thicker the section, the longer the production cycle, the higher the cost.  Therefore, the aim should be to keep sections as thin as possible and this will have the added benefit of less material content.  Adding ribs rather than section is the preferred route if extra strength is required.


Another factor, of course, is material selection.  Thermoplastics can vary considerably in price from around £1 per kg for basic polyolefins up to £30 per kg and more for specialised polymers.  Even within the more general ranges of commodity and engineering polymers there is wide variation in price.  The density of different polymers also varies leading to potentially heavier parts and higher cost.

This is an area where expert advice, such as that provided by Rutland Plastics, can be of benefit.  Although it may be possible to design a part to use a cheaper material, e.g. polypropylene, by use of ribs and thicker sections, it may actually work out cheaper to use a stronger but more expensive material, such as nylon or ABS.  Fewer ribs may then be required and the part could have thinner sections.

Material datasheets can only be of limited use here with strength and stiffness key properties as outlined in previous articles.  It is far better to be guided by expert advice from a moulder or material supplier with experience of a range of applications for different polymers.


Injection mould tooling is relatively expensive but it is not always the case that injection moulding is only suited to high volume production.  If it is possible to combine two or more parts into a single moulding, for example, then the cost of assembly and possible other ancillary parts can be saved making injection moulding a viable option.

It is also true that the simpler the mould tool the lower the cost.  If possible design parts without holes in the side walls, undercuts and other complex features.  If the part does need holes in the side then the decision on whether to mould these in or produce them using a secondary operation will depend on anticipated quantities of the part – the higher the number of parts required the more economical it becomes to have the moulded in.


Rutland Plastics has produced a free guide covering all aspects of designing for injection moulding.